HOME |
CONTACTS |
LINKS |
PUBLICATIONS |
Vas
Petrenko
Office: 101 Vaughan Hall
Phone: 858.534.4188
Fax: 858.822.3161
Email: vpetrenko@ucsd.edu
The aim of my PhD project is to constrain the methane sources during fast methane increases associated with abrupt climate warming events during the last glacial period as well as during the deglaciation. Figure 1 shows the Greenland temperature record between 10 and 60 thousand years ago reconstructed from ice cores.

Many of these large and abrupt warming events are evident in the record. Several of the warming events are associated with large increases in atmospheric methane concentrations, which can be reconstructed from ancient air that is trapped in bubbles in glacial ice in places like Greenland and Antarctica. Figure 2 shows climate records from ice cores in Greenland and Bolivia for the past 20 thousand years – a period that includes the end of the last glacial period, the deglaciation, and the present warm period, known as the Holocene.
Two
large abrupt
warming events,
each about
10 °C
in
magnitude, are
found in
the Greenland
record at
about 11.5
and 14.5
thousand years
ago. As
can be
seen, each
of these
warming events
is accompanied
by a
large synchronous
rise in
atmospheric methane.
Methane
is of
interest in
paleoclimatic studies
because it
is an
important greenhouse
gas (about
23 times
as efficient
as CO2
at absorbing
infrared radiation),
as well
as an
important player
in global
atmospheric chemistry.
Methane concentration
is also
a global
signal. While
temperature change
can vary
significantly between
different regions
of the
Earth, the
global atmosphere
mixes on
a timescale
of about
1 year;
thus a
significant change
in methane
emissions in
one area
of the
planet will
be quickly
reflected in
methane concentrations
worldwide. At
the time
of the
last deglaciation,
methane was
not being
produced anywhere
in the
vicinity of
Greenland, so
a methane
rise at
the time
of Greenland
warming suggests
that climate
had to
be changing
significantly in
primary methane-producing
regions (mostly
low latitudes
at the
time of
deglaciation).
There
are currently
two main
hypotheses to
explain the
atmospheric methane
rise during
such warming
events. The
first, known
as the
wetland hypothesis,
states that
as the
global climate
became warmer
and wetter,
methane production
in the
wetlands increased.
Wetlands are
the main
natural source
of methane
to the
atmosphere today,
and have
been shown
to respond
to warmer,
wetter conditions
with increased
methane production.
The
second hypothesis,
known as
the hydrate
hypothesis, states
that most
of the
rapid methane
increase can
be explained
by massive
destabilization of
marine methane
hydrates. Methane
hydrate is
an ice-like
compound consisting
of methane
and water
molecules, and
is stable
at low
temperatures and
high pressures.
Methane hydrates
commonly form
in the
oceans at
intermediate depths,
where abundant
organic matter
is available
in the
sediments. It
is estimated
that methane
hydrates worldwide
contain as
much or
more organic
carbon as
all the
world’s
oil, coal,
and gas
reserves taken
together. This
hypothesis states
that as
the climate
was warming
rapidly, some
of the
ocean circulation
at intermediate
depths may
have changed,
bringing significantly
warmer water
down to
the hydrate
deposits. The
hydrates would
have then
destabilized and
released large
amounts of
methane gas
into the
atmosphere. The
stability of
methane hydrates
under climate
warming conditions
is important
to understand
in light
of current
global warming.
Destabilization of
large amounts
of methane
hydrates and
subsequent release
of methane
into the
atmosphere would
accelerate climate
warming through
enhancing the
greenhouse effect.
One
way to
distinguish between
the hydrate
and wetland
sources is
to look
at the
carbon-14 content
of methane.
C-14 is
a naturally
produced radioactive
isotope of
carbon with
a half-life
of about
5,700 years.
Methane produced
from wetlands
has a
C-14 content
essentially identical
to the
C-14 content
of atmospheric
CO2 at
the time
of production.
Hydrate methane,
on the
other hand,
contains no
C-14 because
hydrates are
generally hundreds
of thousands
to millions
of years
old, and
all the
C-14 has
decayed away.
The
main challenge
in using
this approach
is obtaining
enough ancient
air from
the time
of these
rapid warming
events to
perform a
C-14 measurement
on methane.
Ancient air
can be
obtained from
old glacial
ice. However,
because methane
is a
very minor
constituent of
atmosphere, it
turns out
that about
2 tons
of ice
are needed
for a
sample of
this kind!
Such a
large amount
of ice
for one
time period
is not
available from
ice cores.
Our
solution to
this problem
was to
explore a
site on
the Greenland
ice margin
where old
ice becomes
exposed at
the surface.
We have
been able
to find
and date
ice from
the time
of the
last deglaciation.
This was
accomplished by
comparing records
of several
geochemical parameters
(see Figure
3) from
our site
to records
in the
Greenland ice
cores, which
are well
dated. We
have been
subsequently able
to obtain
several large-volume
air samples
for C-14
of methane
analyses, and
are currently
developing techniques
for processing
these challenging
samples. Our
preliminary results
indicate that
the methane
record in
our samples
is intact,
and further
suggest that
the C-14
of methane
in the
ice at
our site
is also
unaltered.
Several
photos show
our Greenland
sampling site and illustrate
the work
that we
do there.